Public v. Private Schools
A large-scale government-financed study has concluded that students in regular public schools do as well or significantly better in math than comparable students in private schools.
The study, by Christopher Lubianski and Sarah Theule Lubianski of the University of Illinois, compared fourth- and eighth-grade math scores of more than 340,000 students in 13,000 regular public, charter and private schools on the 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress. The 2003 test was given to 10 times more students than any previous test, providing a trove of data.
Though private school students long have scored higher on the national assessment, commonly referred to as "the nation's report card," the new study used advanced statistical techniques to adjust for the effects of income, school and home circumstances. The researchers compared math scores because, they said, math is considered a clearer measure of a school's effectiveness.
The study found that while the raw scores of fourth-graders in Catholic schools, for example, were 14.3 points higher than those in public schools, when adjustments were made for student backgrounds, those in Catholic schools scored 3.4 points lower than those in public schools. A spokeswoman for the National Catholic Education Association did not respond to requests for comment.
The exam is scored on a 0-500 point scale, with 235 being the average score at fourth grade, and 278 being the average score at eighth grade. A 10-11 point difference in scores is roughly equivalent to one grade level.
It also found that charter schools, privately operated and publicly financed, did significantly more poorly than public schools in the fourth grade, once student populations were taken into account. In the eighth grade, students in charters did slightly better than those in public schools, though the sample size was small and the difference was not statistically significant, the study said.
"Overall," the study said, "demographic differences between students in public and private schools more than account for the relatively high raw scores of private schools. Indeed, after controlling for these differences, the presumably advantageous private school effect disappears, and even reverses in most cases."
The findings are likely to bolster critics of policies supporting charter schools and vouchers as the solution for failing public schools.
Howard Nelson, a lead researcher at the American Federation of Teachers, said the new study is based on the most current and comprehensive national data available. The AFT, an opponent of vouchers that has criticized the charter movement, in 2004 studied some of the same data and reported that charter schools lagged traditional public schools.
This book is guaranteed to spark lively debates and critical thinking in any classroom! Two of the most respected voices in education identify 50 myths and lies that threaten America's public schools. Berliner and Glass argue that many citizens' conception of K-12 public education in the United States is more myth than reality. Warped opinions about our nation's public schools include: they are inferior to private schools; they are among the worst in the world in math and science; teachers should be fired if their students don't score at the national average, and on and on.
"Right now the studies seem to show that charter schools do no better, and private schools do worse," he said. "If private schools are going to get funding, they need to be held accountable for the results."
Supporters of vouchers and charter schools, however, pointed to the study's limitations, saying it gave only a snapshot of performance, not a sense of how students progress over time. Jeanne Allen, president of the Center for Education Reform, said other state and local studies showed results more favorable to charter schools.
Nelson Smith, president of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, said many students come to charter schools after doing poorly in traditional public school, and take time to show improvement. "Snapshots are always going to be affected by that lag," Smith said.
Officials at the U.S. Education Department, which has been a forceful proponent of vouchers and charter schools, said they did not see this study as decisive. "We've seen reports on both sides of this issue," said Holly Kuzmich, deputy assistant secretary for policy. "It just adds one more to the list."
The study was financed with a grant from the Education Department's Institute of Education Sciences, but was independent. The federal government is expected itself to issue two more studies looking at the same data and using similar techniques. Those studies are still undergoing peer review, but are expected to be released in early spring.
The study found that self-described conservative Christian schools, the fastest growing sector of private schools, fared poorest, with their students falling as much as one year behind counterparts in public schools, once socioeconomic factors such as income, ethnicity and access to books and computers , were considered.
Taylor Smith, a vice president at the Association of Christian Schools, which represents 5,400 conservative Christian schools, said many members did not participate in the national assessment, which he thought could make it a skewed sample. He didn't know how many schools from other Christian groups participated.
The report found that among the private schools, Lutheran schools did better than other private schools. Nevertheless, at the fourth-grade level, a 10.7 point lead in math scores evaporated into a 4.2 point lag behind public schools. At the eighth-grade level, a 21 point lead, roughly the equivalent of two grade levels, disappeared after adjusting for differences in student backgrounds.
Copyright 2005 New York Times BY DIANA JEAN SCHEMO